More interesting than Radiohead
Posted Under: Music
I don’t know about you, but I’m pretty curious about the Girl Talk release.
It’s getting a lot of attention, although nothing like Radiohead did. And although Girl Talk is clearly following in Radiohead’s footsteps by releasing a record on a pay-what-you-want basis, in my view this is a lot more significant. And not just because Radiohead generally bores me to tears.
In addition to that factor, it’s because, as I’ve said before, the whole Radiohead thing was imperfect as an indicator of where the music business might be headed for the simple reason that Radiohead is in fact a creation of the major-label system. The band benefited mightily from the precise traditional band-building method that anti-label zealouts are so fond of attacking. So when those zealots said that In Rainbows demonstrated the death of big music and a portent of a new, enlightened future, their argument was rather seriously undercut by the fact that Radiohead is a product of big music. Period.
So what happens when an artist who was not built by the labels starts dabbling with new distribution methods, and, potentially, builds a major name for him/her/itself in the process?
Girl Talk is at least potentially a more interesting case study to watch.
Plus, Girl Talk gets bonus points for being basically a mashup artist who uses massive numbers of samples to build songs, and apparently doesn’t clear any of it with rights-holders. So he’s pretty thoroughly postmodern.
Thus I’m watching this with interest. (And listening. I paid $10 for the release, and have been listening to it over the weekend.)
The Globe and Mail adds this interesting detail:
If you offer to pay nothing for the download, you get sent to a page with a form that asks you why you are paying nothing, and then gives you a series of check boxes, including:
— I may donate later
— I can’t afford to pay
— I don’t really like Girl Talk
— I don’t believe in paying for music
— I have already purchased this album
— I don’t value music made from sampling
— I am part of the press, radio, or music industry
— Other reasons
I’d love to see the results of that!
Radiohead, of course, never did open up about who paid what for In Rainbows.
Maybe Girl Talk will turn out to be cooler than that….
Reader Comments
I hope they open up about the results of the poll. I suspect a lot of people who do not know GT (myself included) will choose “I may donate later” and pay something if they like what they hear.
Don’t hate on Radiohead, RW. They are a product of the music industry, certainly, but my overall listening experience is richer for it by heaps.
Girl Talk was featured in the Dutch documentary “Good Copy, Bad Copy” for his mashup/licensing stance — you can watch it online at http://goodcopybadcopy.net .
He generally lets the music go for free, not really seeking profit from the albums — his live shows do charge, and they’re absolutely phenomenal, as he mixes samples live. He is VERY well known in the college music scene, and thus the music blogosphere. I personally paid $0.00 for the album, love it, and will see him live many times over, whenever possible.
Also, didn’t Radiohead only give away In Rainbows to the first 5,000 people? As far as I know, Feed the Animals doesn’t have a limit.
Indeed, pretty exciting stuff, especially because the album is quite excellent. Girl Talk is a guy who gets these issues in a pretty profound way, and is partially responsible for The Coolest Moment in the History of Congress, also courtesy of Mike Doyle (D-PA).
Kate: Thanks much for the tip on that doc, will check it out. I believe Radiohead’s pay-what-you-want thing was more open-ended than 5k people, though.
Thanks to all for the comments/feedback on this. More to come I think…