AntiFriday: Twitter haters, home debranders, etc.
Murketing’s weekly roundup of backlashes, dissent, and critiques:
1. Noah Brier‘s Brand Tags project doesn’t really have anti or backlashy intentions, I don’t think, but it’s really made the rounds and is worth noting as a kind of critique-enabler. If you haven’t seen it, basically the idea is you pick a brand from a list and enter the first word that you associate with the brand, then you click for the results: A tag cloud where the size of the words shown indicates how often people have typed them in as their gut reaction to a brand.
Needless to say, those gut reactions can result in some pointedly anti sentiments.
The most interesting one to me is the cloud for Twitter, which rather prominently features reactions such as “annoying,” “pointless,” “stupid” and “useless.” Meanwhile, lots of people also seem to love Twitter, and see it as wildly important. (I’ll never forget this Johnnie Moore post in which he suggested that asking “what’s the point of Twitter?” is like asking “What’s the point of life?” So if you don’t like Twitter, kill yourself?)
I just can’t get worked up about Twitter either way. Why do people have such extreme reactions to it?
2. AdPulp points the way to Debranded Home, a site “committed to helping you reduce visual pollution by lessening brand presence in your home.” The idea is that once you’ve bought something and taken it home, “its label has served its purpose.” Debranded Home offers no-brand labels instead. (The set at right costs $9 plus shipping.) I assume the idea is you put the cleaning product or shampoo or whatever into another container of your choice, then put the new label on it. There are also how-to guides for making your own cleaners.
I suppose the noteworthy thing about this is that traditionally the argument over too-much-branding-and-advertising has been about public space. I suspect more people are bothered by branding that interrupts a walk in the park or whatever. But maybe this is the last resort, at least in your own home you can escape branding, even though it’s on stuff you actually bought?
Anyway … your thoughts?
List continues after the jump.
3. Disney’s decision to shut down a free virtual online Disneyland (“Virtual Magic Kingdom”) ticked off fans, says WSJ. “One slick Web site created to help save VMK has gathered nearly 20,000 signatures on its online petition, while blogs maintained by the Disney faithful continue to decry the company’s move. A real-life protest to sway the Burbank, Calif., entertainment company’s thinking largely fizzled, though. Only about a dozen die-hard fans picketed outside Disneyland’s main gates on May 10, carrying placards and a banner riffing Disney’s “Year of a Million Dreams” campaign that read, “Year of a Million Broken Dreams.”
4. Generally I read the Houston Chronicle every day only for news of the Astros and Rockets. But here’s a story about a co-op in the Montrose that “caters to consumers who have a bone to pick with big retailers.” Sample customer comment: “Generally speaking, I absolutely refuse to shop at Wal-Mart and I always try to go just as local as possible. … I try to stay away from corporate America as much as possible.”
5. Finally, this one isn’t exactly anti- or backlashy either, but there’s an interesting critique of consumption habits in the Buy-By Brian Blog. As you may know, Ada Puiu interviewed its proprietor right here on Murketing.com earlier this week.
Reader Comments
To draw an analogy is not to suggest identity. If you read my post in full I don’t think it says anything like what you imply here.
I was making a point about the rhetorical question “what’s the point of…” and how it often just means “I don’t like” Asking “what’s the point of twitter” suggests that it has some grand purpose which of course it doesn’t. I’m really saying twitter is trivial, but sometimes “trivial” things, like small talk in the pub or at the water cooler, turn out to have some value. It might be a bit grand to call it a paradox, but there it is.
Still, why bother with context if it gets in the way of a cheap shot?
Hey there — I was just making a joke, not taking a cheap shot. Trying to be funny, that’s all. You want me to take it out? Seriously, I was simply kidding around.
Johnnie, meet Rob. Rob, Johnnie. I bet you guys would be friends in real life.
heh… oh well i’ll stop growling then :)
Hell yes to “Debranded Home.” I design ads for a living. I don’t want to see them in my house. Products that don’t come in aesthetically pleasing packages/labels either get the labels peeled off, or they get put into different containers…or they don’t get purchased to begin with.
Nice site, btw. It’s my first visit, and you’re my newest bookmark.
Let others do what they will, but I can think of several drawbacks to the Debranding containers:
1. It’s extra work to transfer the products into the new containers. You’ll have to use funnels.
2. Each transfer will cause you to lose some of the product, as the residue from your hand lotion or whatever remains in its original container. You’ll go through the products faster, which I guess is great news for the manufacturers.
3. It’s yet another product to buy, beyond the lotions and shampoos themselves, which you’re already buying.
4. How is this any better than buying or reusing just about any other suitable container that’s already out there (perhaps at the Container Store) and sticking your own label on it? Do we really need a special product designed for the express purpose of un-branding your branded products–a product that is, in a way, itself a branded product?
I hit send too soon.
5. Don’t you need to check the expiration date sometimes on your products after you’ve had them for a while? Or check the list of ingredients?
okay, I think I’m done.
David: Thanks for the peacemaker role, and Johnnie Moore, thanks for understanding and again sorry for the misunderstanding. No harm no foul .. I hope!
Collier and Rebecca, thanks for the feedback on the debranding thing. I’m still sort of on the fence. I understand the urge, but buying a premade debranding set seems weird to me.
I don’t think most people do have extreme reactions to Twitter. Those are just the people you notice because they make a lot of noise. Most of us, I suspect, look at something like Twitter, shrug, and then go back to whatever we were doing beforehand.
Twitter doesn’t interest me because I don’t care what my acquaintances are doing every minute of the day, and I don’t want them to know what I’m doing every minute of the day. If some people love Twitter and see it as important, that’s cool. I don’t hate it or anything; it just isn’t useful to me.
Pat: I pretty much feel the same way you do about Twitter. But it’s pretty clear, I think, that others have stronger feelings. Thanks for the feedback.