AntiFriday: In Nike’s face; “Never Greens”; etc.

Posted by Rob Walker on July 25, 2008
Posted Under: Anti,Backlashing

Time for another roundup of the week in backlashes, dissent, and critiques. Here goes.


1. An “in your face” print/outdoor campaign from Nike is accused of blatant homophobia by Towleroad.com — and by many, many comments on the W+K site where the work is posted. Other comments, of course, defend the ads, but some of the images (above, for instance) seem pretty calculated to me. [Thx: discoczech.]

I’m also sort of curious if any of the slang-ologists among you have a reaction to the one below. I associate the phrase “Punks jump up” with the early 1990s Brand Nubian track “Punks Jump Up To Get Beat Down,” which has a great sound — but also, if I remember right, included an anti-gay epithet in the original lyrics that was later excised.

But then again I’m not exactly long on street cred, so maybe the phrase “punks jump up” has other associations and the fact that it makes me think of that song is coincidence. I actually find that particular juxtaposition of image and phrase generally confusing. Any thoughts?


2. BrandWeek on “the Never Greens“:

a small but persistent new consumer demographic — people who either don’t care or are not interested in America’s new passion for sustainable, green products.

It’s a demo that’s been overlooked by marketers as they rush to tout their carbon offsets, recycled content and eco-friendly manufacturing.

About 10% of the population are Never Greens, according to a survey by Mintel International in Chicago, a research firm.

The Never Greens don’t buy green products, don’t remember green advertising when they see it and are irritated by it even if they do, according to Mintel.

More AntiFriday after the jump.

3. A significant majority of UK marketers think the logo for the 2012 Olympics is no good. That’s it at right. I, uh, see their point. Via UnBeige.

4. Commercial Alert to TV station that’s opted to pad advertising revenue by way of a product placement deal that puts McDonald’s coffee in front of news anchors: ” We are appalled.” (Bonus: Apparently while those are McD’s coffee cups, they don’t actually contain coffee. Thx jkd for that detail.)

5. Congressman Edward Markey “grilled” the head honcho of NebuAd (see previous AntiFriday) and called for an opt-in system on online-advertising data mining. Re the NubuAd opt-out alternative:

“That’s basically saying silence is consent and as a result you can do whatever you want with their information,” Markey said. “I don’t think, unless you’ve got clear affirmative permission, that you should be able to take this incredible leap into the breaching of the privacy of Americans.”

6. “IllegalBillboards.org is a new effort launched by the Anti-Advertising Agency with IllegalSigns.ca to help organize and support the removal of illegal billboards in New York.”

7. Meanwhile, just for the record, The American Family Association encourages you to boycott McDonald’s because the company “has chosen not to remain neutral but to give the full weight of their corporation to promoting the homosexual agenda, including homosexual marriage.”

Further diversion may be found at MKTG Tumblr, and the Consumed Facebook page.

Reader Comments

* Never Greens are also known as the people who know that spotted owl tastes a lot like panda.

* I think Unfogged had a commentary on that Nike ad as well – something about how regardless of the homophobia of the ads, getting dunked on such that your opponent’s crotch is in your face is the creme de la creme of on-court humiliation.

#1 
Written By Aaron Weber on July 25th, 2008 @ 9:25 am

They must have anticipated this protest angle when they plotted the ad–did they consider that a plus? I see a bank shot here–an effort to get homophobic people to buy the product featured in the ad, as backlash against the PC backlash against the ad. (or maybe that’s just an ironic New York Magazine style response)

#2 
Written By Frank on July 25th, 2008 @ 3:22 pm

This doesn’t strike me as being homophobic. By my definition, if one were homophobic, you would be against consensual same-sex relationships. There is nothing consensual about what’s happening in that shot. That dude is getting dunked on most assuredly against his will.

I would make the argument that Nike is saying “that ain’t right” about non-consensual sexual behavior, gay or otherwise.

#3 
Written By Rick Liebling on July 25th, 2008 @ 4:25 pm

I’ve appropriated and slightly edited the ad for my site’s banner head. Still completely effective, but now with 50% less homophobia!

http://eyecube.wordpress.com

#4 
Written By Rick Liebling on July 25th, 2008 @ 5:17 pm

Rob,

Apologies for the multiple posts. Here’s a link to the Brand Nubian song lyrics

http://www.stlyrics.com/songs/b/brandnubian648/punksjumpuptogetbeatdown30174.html

which do indeed include homophobic lyrics. Hmm. I’m a bit of a Nike apologist, so I’m still having a hard time with this one. My guess is that we have a case of insensitivity more than outright homophobia.

#5 
Written By Rick Liebling on July 25th, 2008 @ 7:47 pm

Thanks for the feedback, all.

#6 
Written By Rob Walker on July 28th, 2008 @ 10:33 am

I don’t think that’s homophobic. The images depicted in the ads represent some of the worst things that one basketball player can do to another. In basketball culture, “crowning” somebody (which both of these images essentially are of), or the opposite of that, getting “crowned,” is considered extremely humiliating (and something that you will never live down). No one that plays basketball wants to be crowned! So, for Nike’s particular target market, that ad speaks right to them. (I must admit though that the phrase “punks jump up” is completely lost on me).

Having said that, I would be more concerned whether this “in your face” campaign is a smart strategy for Nike. Haven’t they in the past tried several aggressive campaigns like this and they (no pun intended) blew up in their face?

#7 
Written By Salam Kitmitto on July 28th, 2008 @ 10:33 am