Warning: "continue" targeting switch is equivalent to "break". Did you mean to use "continue 2"? in /usr/home/web/users/a0009655/html/murketing.com/wp-includes/pomo/plural-forms.php on line 210
Pleasing Snickers wrapper

Pleasing Snickers wrapper

Posted by Rob Walker on July 24, 2008
Posted Under: The Designed Life

From The Dieline:

My son recently alerted me to a stark new wrapper for Snickers that he found at a Wal-Mart in Tulsa. Not a full-fledged Snicker redesign, I don’t think. Apparently this version of Snickers is a Wal-Mart exclusive. Strikes a lot of people as sort of Soviet-looking.

A comment to the Dieline post suggests its part of a nostalgia promotion. Whatever the explanation, I like it. I also like the concept of a “Wal-Mart exclusive.”

Further diversion may be found at MKTG Tumblr, and the Consumed Facebook page.

Reader Comments

I also like the concept of a “Wal-Mart exclusive.”

what this tends to mean is actually “lower-quality product the manufacturer won’t sell anywhere else,” a category of product created by brands’ desire to get on Wal-Mart shelves but inability to make a profit with their normal products given Wal-Mart’s, er, “hard-bargaining” tactics with regard to its suppliers.

Bottom line: this Snickers bar probably differs from a normal Snickers bar in two ways:
i) novel packaging
ii) inferior ingredients

#1 
Written By jkd on July 24th, 2008 @ 10:41 am

re: jkd’s comments … Seems like changing the Snickers mix to include inferior ingredients would be more trouble (i.e., more expensive) than it’s worth. Has Snickers had any trouble finding space on Wal-Mart’s shelves? I happen to live in Tulsa (where Rob’s son spotted the retro-snack package). While I haven’t noticed the promotional packaging we are discussing, I can assure you that Snickers and all the other sugary candies and treats are well-represented in the racks at the checkout line.

My theory (as told from Snickers’ perspective) … Hey, let’s change the wrapper on one giant batch of Snickers–yeah, the exact same Snickers bar we’ve been churning out for 200 years (give or take)–and ship ’em out to every Wal-Mart. Snickers will stand out on the candy racks, and we’ll sell more candy bars.

#2 
Written By Rugbar on July 24th, 2008 @ 11:41 am

One quick note of clarity: That bit about “my son” in Tulsa is a quote from The Dieline. I don’t have kids, in Tulsa or anywhere else.

I also tend to doubt that the ingredients are different, for what it’s worth. It’s surely a pure packaging stunt.

#3 
Written By Rob Walker on July 24th, 2008 @ 11:57 am

For what it’s worth, I was in a Wal*Mart over the 4th of July when I saw the new Snickers package. I thought it was really cool looking. I bought and took it home and froze it. Ate it yesterday on the way to work. It was awesome.

#4 
Written By Allen Weaver on July 24th, 2008 @ 4:08 pm

Yeah, thinking about it more, it seems less likely that Snickers would put bad peanuts into their Wal-Mart brand. But, notwithstanding, that is definitely the case with, e.g. Levi’s.

#5 
Written By jkd on July 24th, 2008 @ 4:47 pm

i like it

#6 
Written By joshua daggett on August 5th, 2008 @ 3:26 am

i think it’s a reproduction of the old original packaging.

#7 
Written By jolene on August 21st, 2008 @ 11:21 pm

I found one of these snickers here in Lewiston, ID. It was stuck in a box of regularly wrapped snickers, but it could have just been dumped in there when they switched out a new box. Regardless, it tasted just as good as any other snickers I’ve had and as a marketing tactic it sure did the trick when I was deciding which candy to buy.

#8 
Written By Maik on August 22nd, 2008 @ 1:43 pm

Iluuvv Snickers

#9 
Written By trisha on March 25th, 2011 @ 2:32 pm
Next Post:
Previous Post: